I can think of a few situations this may be necessary.
■They’re moving
■You’re moving
■You’ve taught them all you can
■It’s not a good fit
■They’re off to music school
■You are downsizing
■They want to learn something you don’t teach
Whatever the reason, the next teacher will assess their ability, progress, and potential and our teaching effectiveness. Possibly an embarrassing prospect. The next teacher will be impressed with our work if the student has learned the basics, has mastered the technique at their level, has learned how to practice and they still possess the joy to play that attracted them to music in the first place.
When I interview a prospective transfer student or I’m evaluating a student in a professional situation some of the things I’m looking for are:
■Enthusiastic attitude
■Good hands (technique)
■The student can clap accurately the rhythm in the music I give them (shows me they’ve worked on the basics)
■They are clear on their objectives (clarity of purpose)
■They can play a few favourite pieces (indicates their musical preferences)
■They have a few favourite pieces (an excellent indicator of enthusiasm)
■They listen to the music they want to study. (If they want to study classical music they enjoy actively listening to it. Ditto for jazz, pop, whatever.)
In the book “Practicing, A musician’s returned to music” by Glenn Kurtz, Kurtz muses with regret the technical deficiencies he brought to music school.
Wynton Marsalis in all his writings stresses the work ethic, a good heart, and mastering the basics. His books “To a young musician” and his latest, which I finished recently, “Moving to higher ground” harps constantly on these themes.
So, I suggest they interview teachers and select the one who stresses the basics, is student focused, and has a history of success in the area the student wants to work. Find a teacher who will stretch them, challenge them, and encourage them. Seek one who is creative, enthusiastic and knowledgeable.
Cheers
David Story
No comments:
Post a Comment